Big News: FounderDating is joining OneVest to build the largest community for entrepreneurs. Details here
Latest Notifications
You have no recent recommendations.
Name
Title
 
MiniBio
FOLLOW
Title
 Followers
FOLLOW TOPIC

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur

How 50/50 co-founders make decisions?

Hello everybody,

Any direction how to structure your voting in a 2-founder startup with 50/50 ownership? How can dead-lock situations, where none of the founders wants to give up be avoided.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

Thanks!
Toddy

19 Replies

Andrei Pop
2
0
Andrei Pop Entrepreneur
CEO at HumanAPI
Don't split equity 50/50... it's a terrible idea. If you decide you must, one of you has to be CEO and the other must be ok with this.
Eric Norman
0
0
Eric Norman Entrepreneur
Kaizen-ing food
There is a great post on this subject by Mark Suster:http://www.bothsidesofthetable.com/2011/05/09/the-co-founder-mythology/

Essentially, someone needs to be in control, and make sure you have a contingency plan in case someone takes a different opportunity along the way (e.g. vesting agreement).
Sean Hurley
0
0
Sean Hurley Entrepreneur • Advisor
Strategic Marketing Leader with strong financial results for growing organizations
Someone needs majority equity to avoid gridlock.
Scott Foster
1
0
Scott Foster Advisor
Business and Entrepreneurial Attorney at Bulkley Richardson
Don't do 50/50. The analogy that I always give is this - if you are in a car driving toward a cliff, the last thing you want is an argument over whether we should turn left or right. The direction doesn't matter, turning matters. After we turn away from the cliff, we can talk about whether left or right was the best decision. But we'll be able to have that conversation because we won't have died in a fiery car crash.

Same issue in a business. Making a bad decision is rarely fatal. Being unable to move in any direction is routinely fatal.

If people really want to structure something 50/50, I have them flip a coin for control. They can still have equal ownership, but someone has got to be able to grab ahold of the wheel.
Dimitry Rotstein
2
0
Dimitry Rotstein Entrepreneur
Head of R&D at SafeZone
A common solution, as far as I know, is to have an external tie-breaker - someone whom both founders trust, and who will only have a tie-breaking vote. Or he could have the usual 1-3% of the shares advisers get, in which case the tie-breaking ability is granted automatically.
Giving one of the two founders (the CEO) a tie-breaking vote probably won't work, because with just two votes the CEO will effectively have 100% voting power (since nothing can overpower his vote), which would leave the other founder with no formal influence whatsoever, thus breaking up the team. Unless of course, the second founder has complete trust in CEO's decisions, but then you shouldn't have tie problems in the first place.
Kate Hiscox
2
0
Kate Hiscox Entrepreneur • Advisor
Boss at Venzee
Hi Toddy, You could form a board and add a third person. That would be my suggestion. Sent from my iPhone
Michael Brill
0
0
Michael Brill Entrepreneur
Technology startup exec focused on AI-driven products
Obviously avoid putting yourself in that situation in the first place (certainly agree that 50/50 equity split is a bad idea)... but if you do find yourself there, one thing I use on a personal level is that you ask each other how important it is on a scale of 1-10. The vast majority of things are not going to be 10 for each of you. Much, much better than having a third party tie-breaker come in... that just breeds resentment. Even if you don't use 1-10 scale in business, try it on a personal level - it really does work well.
Scott Foster
0
0
Scott Foster Advisor
Business and Entrepreneurial Attorney at Bulkley Richardson
Sorry, I was so blinded by the issue that I didn't offer a solution. Three person board is the way to go.
Manu Chatterjee
0
0
Manu Chatterjee Entrepreneur • Advisor
CEO at Moodwire
Having been in this position before I would say try to avoid it if at all possible. As other commentators have said there needs to be one voice for the company. If you are already there then getting a 3rd voice ( such as a board member) is useful, but remember that when you are in a funding or customer meeting that you both must appear to present one unified voice for the venture.
Ben Sweat
0
0
Ben Sweat Entrepreneur
Director, Product at Idealab
If both on the board, then have a third board member. Or be 51/49 split. ;) Sent from my iPhone
Join FounderDating to participate in the discussion
Nothing gets posted to LinkedIn and your information will not be shared.

Just a few more details please.

DO: Start a discussion, share a resource, or ask a question related to entrepreneurship.
DON'T: Post about prohibited topics such as recruiting, cofounder wanted, check out my product
or feedback on the FD site (you can send this to us directly info@founderdating.com).
See the Community Code of Conduct for more details.

Title

Give your question or discussion topic a great title, make it catchy and succinct.

Details

Make sure what you're about to say is specific and relevant - you'll get better responses.

Topics

Tag your discussion so you get more relevant responses.

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
Know someone who should answer this question? Enter their email below
Stay current and follow these discussion topics?