Big News: FounderDating is joining OneVest to build the largest community for entrepreneurs. Details here
Latest Notifications
You have no recent recommendations.
Name
Title
 
MiniBio
FOLLOW
Title
 Followers
FOLLOW TOPIC

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur

equal split of equity among 4 co founders, is it bad or good ?

Hi Sir/Madam,
We are a team of 4 co founders, all equally important and bring in enormous value to the entire product in their own ways. Will it be difficult for us to raise funding for equal splits of equity that we have now. What are some of the ways we can avoid equal split based on performance on 6 months from now ? We are having a hard time defining equity splits among us although we are pacing fast with the product that we are building but hearing different stories from folks based on even split, is it going to be a problem i future ?

Thanks

5 Replies

Nofyah Shem Tov
1
0
Nofyah Shem Tov Entrepreneur
Founder BlogMyLunch
Hi,
I am a Founder who started by myself and I'm now adding partners. I suggest you read a lot on the subject before dividing anything.http://qz.com/309042/a-better-formula-for-calculating-startup-equity/

I suggest these handy tools for calculating who should get what: www.foundrs.com
http://foundersolutions.com/founder_equity_solution


to help you understand dilution:
http://ownyourventure.com/equitySim.html


Best of luck!

Nofyah Shem Tov


Renan Prado
0
0
Renan Prado Entrepreneur
Employer Branding na Natura Cosméticos
Hi Jyotirmoy,

This is a very important definition for the future success of a startup and you need to consider some points as: do you the intention to receive capital from VCs? I'm asking you this, because if your intention is to run a lifestyle business you don't need to worry so much about this. But normally, a equal split is complicated and the most entrepreneurs and VCs avoid. There is a website that can help you to simulate a better split of equity based on the real contribution: foundrs.com
Rod Abbamonte
0
0
Rod Abbamonte Advisor
Co Founder at STARTREK / @startupHunter / @startupWay / @CoFounderFound / @GOcapital / @startupClub / @lastminute
Jyotirmoy, there are not an correct answer a priori. Depende of how much each co founder invests in knowledge, time and cash but at the end the most important is how much comfortable each founder can feel with your equities
Neil Gordon
0
0
Neil Gordon Advisor
Board Member, Corporate Finance Advisor and Strategy Consultant
I've not seen where equal allocations to founders have concerned investors, as such. Knowing that the key execs have the right incentives post-investment (and post-dilution), on the other hand, is a genuine concern.

If roles and importance change over time, those "more important" can be rewarded with added equity, directly or via options.

It's also possible for equal equity shares to vest by different criteria, if objective milestones can be identified. Not easy, because everyone relies on the team, but perhaps worth considering.
Tom DiClemente
0
0
Tom DiClemente Advisor
Management Consulting | Interim CEO/COO | Coach
Hi Jyotirmoy,

Before considering what investors may think, which may or may not be relevant, consider how you will operate up to the time of outside investment and ownership. It is always wise to avoid 50-50 splits and splitting equally among four also allows deadlock when an important decision can only be made by a vote.

Someone is probably the leader and providing for one person to cast a deciding vote in the event of a deadlock among the four partners is wise when you want to run fast.

But even more, setting the proportions at too early a stage can cause a host of problems later on. Consider that you can apportion only a small amount of the shares you've considered and put most of each person's equity in as either forfeitable shares or options yet to vest. In this way, each person can have precise goals that need to be met to achieve their monthly vesting. Those that contribute receive their intended shares. Those that do not, do not. Of course, you need to be fair in such a system. It requires open communications. Always warn those who are falling behind and give them a chance to recover before deciding not to invest a portion.

You can also have buyback provisions, and they do work much of the time, but I've found that these disincentivize many good contributors.

I've founded nine companies and advised and/or invested in scores more. I've seen many of those companies hastily set up and shares apportioned too early. The type of system above, where shares are possible to be forfeited from the beginning in an agreed upon and open way, has always worked for me.

Thanks, Tom
Join FounderDating to participate in the discussion
Nothing gets posted to LinkedIn and your information will not be shared.

Just a few more details please.

DO: Start a discussion, share a resource, or ask a question related to entrepreneurship.
DON'T: Post about prohibited topics such as recruiting, cofounder wanted, check out my product
or feedback on the FD site (you can send this to us directly info@founderdating.com).
See the Community Code of Conduct for more details.

Title

Give your question or discussion topic a great title, make it catchy and succinct.

Details

Make sure what you're about to say is specific and relevant - you'll get better responses.

Topics

Tag your discussion so you get more relevant responses.

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
Know someone who should answer this question? Enter their email below
Stay current and follow these discussion topics?