Big News: FounderDating is joining OneVest to build the largest community for entrepreneurs. Details here
Latest Notifications
You have no recent recommendations.
Name
Title
 
MiniBio
FOLLOW
Title
 Followers
FOLLOW TOPIC

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur

Does raising funding from VCs limit your exit?

Since VC firms are going after the 10x returns in order to comply with their investment thesis and keep their LPs happy I wonder if that philosophy also impacts the exit opportunities of the entrepreneurs that accept financing from VCs.

4 Replies

Scott McGregor
0
0
Scott McGregor Entrepreneur • Advisor
Advisor, co-founder, consultant and part time executive to Tech Start-ups. Based in Silicon Valley.
It most assuredly does. VCs want to pay off their LPs within a fixed number of years that their fund lasts, and they want a high ROI. Founders might well be happy with more modest profits and a lifestyle business. But that won't meet VC needs.
Irwin Stein
0
0
Irwin Stein Advisor
Very experienced (40 years) corporate,securities and real estate attorney.
VCs are generally happy if there is an exit. A lot depends on the relationship that you have with the firm and the terms of the original financing. I have seen VC firms buy out the founders rather than let them sell out to a 3rd party "too cheap" but its rare. in some cases the entrepreneurs can sit out and let the VC bring in new management to continue to grow the firm.
Peter Baltaxe
0
0
Peter Baltaxe Entrepreneur • Advisor
Consultant, product leader, serial entrepreneur
In many VC investment deals there will be a clause or clauses that give them some approval right over the liquidity event of the company. There may be a minimum size for a liquidity event stated. They want the ability to block a sale that might be great for the founders but bad for the investors, e.g. the "acquihire." Even if this is the best outcome for the company, having the right to block such a deal gives them some negotiating leverage to get the best return for themselves (and their LPs) that they can get out of the transaction.
Michael Barnathan
0
0
Michael Barnathan Entrepreneur • Advisor
Co-Founder of The Mountaintop Program, Google Alum
Investors normally demand a right of refusal on potential exits for this reason. So although the entrepreneur typically feels they have a duty to generate a return for the investor anyway, the investor has the power to veto such deals. Of course, the founders still have to be incentivized enough to continue working, and a blocked exit is one of those things that might destroy that incentive. Investors (good ones, anyway) will probably prefer to talk founders back in rather than using the nuclear option.
Join FounderDating to participate in the discussion
Nothing gets posted to LinkedIn and your information will not be shared.

Just a few more details please.

DO: Start a discussion, share a resource, or ask a question related to entrepreneurship.
DON'T: Post about prohibited topics such as recruiting, cofounder wanted, check out my product
or feedback on the FD site (you can send this to us directly info@founderdating.com).
See the Community Code of Conduct for more details.

Title

Give your question or discussion topic a great title, make it catchy and succinct.

Details

Make sure what you're about to say is specific and relevant - you'll get better responses.

Topics

Tag your discussion so you get more relevant responses.

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
Know someone who should answer this question? Enter their email below
Stay current and follow these discussion topics?