Big News: FounderDating is joining OneVest to build the largest community for entrepreneurs. Details here
Latest Notifications
You have no recent recommendations.
Name
Title
 
MiniBio
FOLLOW
Title
 Followers
FOLLOW TOPIC

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur

Revenue vs. margin optics trade-offs for investors

I'm trying to figure out how to pitch a revenue model to potential investors. The business model conceptually operates on an affiliate revenue basis (I get paid for referring traffic) but technically I take ownership of product for a short period.

So let's say that the model calls for $200 million in transactions at a 7% affiliate fee or $14 million in revenue at basically 100% gross margin. But I'm concerned about the optics of "only" a $14 million business to a tech investor. Alternatively, I can present $200 million with 93% COR or COGS - that shows a much more exciting top line and it's correct from an accounting perspective.

Also, since there is the potential to shunt some of the revenue to own-sourced products with much greater margins than affiliate products, I think it might be a more relevant number.

Thoughts?



18 Replies

Jeff Mills
2
0
Jeff Mills Entrepreneur • Advisor
Global Vice President of Sales at iMerit Technology
Hi Michael, Interesting... I've spent a bunch of time in VC meetings lately and they are ALL about margins. Ultimately the Gross Profit potential is all they are going to see anyway, so showing your GP is based on huge margins is a better story. That said, you can highlight other potential revenue models based on the "owned sourced" products piece... My 2 cents... Jeff
Cynthia Schames
0
1
Cynthia Schames Entrepreneur
Founder & CEO, AbbeyPost
Michael, I think you've answered your own question here...I'd go for the mucho exciting top line. I'm assuming you're looking for early stage investors, and if that's the case, in my experience they'd much rather be wowed by a great entrepreneur/team and an interesting or innovative approach or branding opportunity than worry themselves with such "trivial" matters as profit. (Case in point: Bononos). It seems that VCs care much less (at early stages) about profitability vs. "how big could thus company really get?". If you say "our margins are 7%" they hear "shitty margins"--believe me, I know this from experience. The business model you're describing is really not that dissimilar to Fab or Fancy, so I'd pitch it that way. $200M in revenues. Full stop. Hope my $0.02 helps! (Now you just need a few million more of those) Best, Cynthia
Bill Kelley
0
0
Bill Kelley Entrepreneur • Advisor
Business Mentor
Yes, the second alternative is accurate, since you "own" the revenue -- even if for a short time. That can open the door to short term arbitrage possibilities. Let them go for that bait. Sent from my iPhone 7S
Alan Peters
0
0
Alan Peters Entrepreneur
VP Product and Technology at BusinessBlocks
I've dealt with some similar PandLs. I would usually count the 200 million topline if your actually collecting and paying the transactions. 14 if its a separately collected fee. Essentially the books match how the money actually flows. In either case, is that the maximum possible upside? How much capital are you looking for?
Hoi Lam
5
0
Hoi Lam Entrepreneur
Senior Developer Advocate at Google
I have worked as a technology analyst at two top ranked investment teams at Citigroup and Deutsche Bank. For me, I would regard $14m as the revenue and I would expect other professional investors too.

Some well-known companies such as Groupon has tried to account for the whole $200m and got into a lot of trouble for doing so. Accounting for the whole of the $200m is aggressive.

Also, pay attention to COGS, I know you said "basically" 100% gross margin, the reality is that you will need to account for the running cost / depreciating of your system as well as any traffic or content acquisition costs. Here's how Google define their COGS and they have a high 60s gross margin (excluding Motorola):

P.35 http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312513028362/d452134d10k.htm

"Cost of revenues consists primarily of traffic acquisition costs...Cost of revenues also includes the expenses associated with the operation of our data centers, including depreciation, labor, energy, and bandwidth costs, credit card and other transaction fees related to processing customer transactions, amortization of acquired intangible assets, as well as content acquisition costs."
Cynthia Schames
0
0
Cynthia Schames Entrepreneur
Founder & CEO, AbbeyPost
I think it's very important to make a distinction here between angel investors and institutional investors. Yes, calling $200M your top line revenue is problematic when you're either publicly traded or taking money from institutional investors, because it's actually the SALES number and not the revenue number. But when you're talking to early stage investors, they want to fall in love with your dream and your vision. They know that the actual nuts and bolts of the business as it matures have very little relation to what you talked about or expected in the early days. And most importantly, if you're raising a convertible round, you're not actually issuing a security upon receiving the financing.
John Wallace
0
0
John Wallace Entrepreneur
President at Apps Incorporated
IMO the most important thing an entrepreneur can show investors is that they understand the financials of their business. I'd make sure the numbers reflect the real financial opportunity and gross margins, and account for competition. If you presented this to me as a $200M opportunity with 100% gross margins and no competition, I'd be pretty skeptical. If true, that's incredible! But is it true? Ultimately, if you do a deal you will be contractually bound to hit the numbers or you risk losing everything. (BTW, that doesn't mean that you shouldn't show that there is a vibrant $200M market, especially if there are market forces that will cause it to grow. Also, depending on competition there may be opportunities for greater margins, or other revenue streams. Also, as BIll pointed out, there may be many exciting arbitrage opportunities.)
Robert Clegg
0
0
Robert Clegg Entrepreneur • Advisor
Game Based Learning Expert
Sounds like you shouldn't be presenting this by yourself. The lack of an expert team member in this area will be what becomes apparent. I found Hoi's input extremely credible.
Jack du Rose
1
0
Jack du Rose Entrepreneur
Founder at Colony
My father drummed into me from an early age, "Revenue is vanity, profit is sanity."

My two cents would be to present your figures as transparently as possible, don't try to make it seem like a bigger opportunity than it is; it will only serve to undermine your credibility.
Michael Brill
0
0
Michael Brill Entrepreneur
Technology startup exec focused on AI-driven products
Thanks everyone. A few points:

1. I am not trying to be disingenuous in the least bit... but when it comes time to showing TAM and revenue plan, I gotta choose the bigger number or the smaller number. Think of it like Amazon Marketplace... except that the regulatory environment I'm working in requires taking possession of goods and that it is truly $200m revenue on a GAAP basis. However, imagine that over time certain products that are sold in the affiliate-type model are now sold directly by us (or an entity we control) and instead of the 7% margins, we operate at 20%. That's why I think the $200m number is relevant... in addition to my concern about optics.

2. Hoi, as per Cynthia's comment, I am not trying to represent revenue to the public markets (and even if I were, I'm not sure why the GAAP number would be incorrect). And I hear you on COGS number... was just trying not to clutter the issue... but point taken (having said that, it should be > 90% anyway). Thanks.

3. Robert, thanks for the thought... I'm curious as to where you read naivety into my question. I *feel* like I have a pretty good grasp on the issue (on a side note, I have a BS in finance, have built a financial modeling platform used by some of the world's largest banks and have raised > $100m in capital for 4 companies - including $15 as CEO for my last).

Thanks.
Join FounderDating to participate in the discussion
Nothing gets posted to LinkedIn and your information will not be shared.

Just a few more details please.

DO: Start a discussion, share a resource, or ask a question related to entrepreneurship.
DON'T: Post about prohibited topics such as recruiting, cofounder wanted, check out my product
or feedback on the FD site (you can send this to us directly info@founderdating.com).
See the Community Code of Conduct for more details.

Title

Give your question or discussion topic a great title, make it catchy and succinct.

Details

Make sure what you're about to say is specific and relevant - you'll get better responses.

Topics

Tag your discussion so you get more relevant responses.

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
Know someone who should answer this question? Enter their email below
Stay current and follow these discussion topics?