Big News: FounderDating is joining OneVest to build the largest community for entrepreneurs. Details here
Latest Notifications
You have no recent recommendations.
Name
Title
 
MiniBio
FOLLOW
Title
 Followers
FOLLOW TOPIC

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur
  • Name
    Entrepreneur

Buying back stocks from former co-founder. How do you evaluate (valuate) the worth?

I am a former co-founder of a company. They are wanting to buy back my stocks. We are on good terms overall. I never wanted to sell my stocks and really have no incentive other than these are friends. Left on pretty good terms and are still friends.

How in the world would I go about evaluating the price of these?

Here is what I know:
not-funded, fully bootstrapped
post- success
great team
amazing world changing milestones have been accomplished
they need to keep going and need some more stocks to hold some key players.

I suggested they dilute. They don't want to loose their majority and repeatedly said other people who stayed deserve the stock. To be fair, that's not my problem and hasn't been for a long long time. So, how should one evaluate this?

I believe they will be successful or will get a buy out in the future. They are wonderful and I love them to death. Thus, why would I want to sell?

It's so scary to be that guy who sold his stocks for 10K that are worth 5M in the future. I don't want to be that guy!

I know there is a win win here. I will not give all my stocks up, no way - but if I had an idea of the worth today it would make it easier.

17 Replies

Bobbie Bauer
0
7
Bobbie Bauer Entrepreneur
Vice President - DPM at The Bon Ton Stores Inc.
I will be out of the office Friday, Sept. 26th. In an emergency, please contact Jackie Crist, Katie Dobrinska, Erika Kelly Slager or Laura Rice.
Bill Snapper
1
0
Bill Snapper Entrepreneur
Owner Principal at SammyCO, LLC
Personally, I'd hold onto the stocks I was vested in. They can't be liquidated at this point. I'm assuming you earned them. The structure of the company stock will change drastically once a real funding event occurs. I'd hold on to the stock until that time and then see what the valuation is and if they want to buy the stock back, trade some stock for cash, etc.

I've been there before and it was with friends and they were great. Take that off the table and think with your business head unless it doesn't matter what this could be worth down the road. Just my $.02 worth.
Michael Weickert
1
0
♦ Strategic & Entrepreneurial Executive ♦ Trail-blazing leadership in biotech, medical device & pharmaceutical business
Why would you want to sell indeed! Either there is some other agenda or they are not very creative.

The obvious alternative if you don't sell is for them to give themselves enough shares/options to keep their majority when they increase shares of key employees. If this is entirely bootstrapped then I doubt there is any obstacle to this.

Should you decide for the sake of the relationship to sell some shares, there are NPV models you could potentially use to triangulate a value. If they have revenue and revenue growth already demonstrated, these would be quite practical to use. What would they use to value stock options they would be granting to key employees? A 409A is typical for that.

If you think there is likely to be a good exit and don't want to be leaving a lot of money on the table, 1) find out if that is already in the works and may be behind why they want to buy back your stock and 2) prepare a sales contract where in the event they get an exit in the next xx months/years they split the upside with you.

If you are on good terms and if you don't want to sell because you believe in them and expect success then I would tell them that, share the obvious alternative, and if they don't back off, be concerned that perhaps we are not on such good terms after all.
Lawrence I Lerner
2
0
Lawrence I Lerner Entrepreneur • Advisor
Digitalization and Transformation Coach
Alison this happens more often than you might think. Thanks for starting the conversation.

I think you've answered your own question. You took the stocks as part of your compensation package for an early stage company, not because of their worth today. You took them with the desire and dedication to build a company and create shareholder value. In my opinion, this isn't about valuation and there isn't a win-win scenario. This is an ethical decision on your part. You need to decide if giving up value is something you want to do because you like your former team. There is nothing unfair about keeping stocks you earned as part of your compensation.

If you choose to sell today, you may lose out on value you may have put into them during your time with the company if you undersell. This is one of the "you lose" scenarios. If you sell, earn some cash and the company goes under, "they lose."

Based on that you should make a judgement call. Either sit on them until an event occurs or if you are feeling charitable, "give your stocks away." Give still means selling at any value.

Suppose this wasn't a company you were part of. Suppose you were an anonymous investor for an IPO. You purchase shares and some time down the road, can you image if the board came to you and asked for you to sell back the shares? At that point there would be a well-established sell price. It's an uncomfortable position for them to put you in.

Good luck

Scott Elrod
0
0
Scott Elrod Entrepreneur • Advisor
mHealth technologist☁ex-COO/CIO@Cloud 9-tech for behavioral health■ex-CIO@AmeriDoc(now Teladoc) healing 1.5M patients
http://www.SlicingPie.com/the-grunt-fund-calculator/
how to slice it
https://www.eSharesInc.com/
how to eat it
Eric Wold
1
0
Eric Wold Entrepreneur
CEO @ RingSeven • Web & Mobile Dev • Startups
I think you helped create the value your "friends" are looking to cash in on. Wasn't the prospect of helping to increase the value a big part of the reason you got involved in the first place, and the reason they wanted you involved? So you fulfilled your part of the bargain and the future looks good for the investment. I feel they have crossed an ethical line in asking you to give up the stock for their own enrichment. That's not something that friends do.
Alison Lewis
0
0
Alison Lewis Entrepreneur • Advisor
CEO/Creative Director
I feel like this too. I told them to dilute, they are not liking that idea... so feel a little on the spot.
Alison Lewis
0
0
Alison Lewis Entrepreneur • Advisor
CEO/Creative Director
Great stuff.

I ask myself how would I approach this if I was them and needed to buy back some shares? How would I get shares back if we needed them? For example, a former founder of mine has many, we'll have to buy some back. No way investors will invest with that person having so much. I am on both sides here and it's interesting. Keep the comments going.
Eric Wold
1
0
Eric Wold Entrepreneur
CEO @ RingSeven • Web & Mobile Dev • Startups
Is this really about control or money? What if they paid you to convert your shares to restricted stock?
Could they consolidate voting power without screwing you financially? It would be generous of you to offer such an idea, and their reaction will tell you what is really motivating this.
Paul Bostwick
0
0
Paul Bostwick Entrepreneur
Researcher and Self-Employed Product Designer
They need to solve their problem another way. Paying you a premium for your stocks is one straightforward way (you can offer them a low interest payment plan so they can pay from earnings.) Diluting works. Maybe swapping for a larger number of other stocks (non voting?) If it is the control they want there must be some way for them to rent the shares or buy some options from you? Or buy them from you and at the same time sell you the right to buy them back for X after a certain date (assuming X is less than the guessed at market price) to keep some of the gains in your grasp? That assumes they have enough unencumbered stocks to move into play for the new folks (which I still count as other people's problems.)

I think you do a NPV calculation based on a theory of the exit. If they share the exit theory (and they should or you go find a more positive team to spend your capital) then the price will be reasonable... Anything less is a charity done for a friend (quite noble) anything more is knowing when you have the upper hand and taking what you can (cold, but this is money.) You can give them a discount for the risk they spare you by handing over cash today, but you liked the risk so they should pay you to abandon the possible upside. That is a wash.

Finally I think the test of this is: will they feel the pain as well and in proportion to the gain they hope to get from this move. If everybody is sacrificing some of their upside to get a more likely win, then I'd try to make it go (not as a gift, but as a shared sacrificial move) if not, change the deal to spread the pain.

Join FounderDating to participate in the discussion
Nothing gets posted to LinkedIn and your information will not be shared.

Just a few more details please.

DO: Start a discussion, share a resource, or ask a question related to entrepreneurship.
DON'T: Post about prohibited topics such as recruiting, cofounder wanted, check out my product
or feedback on the FD site (you can send this to us directly info@founderdating.com).
See the Community Code of Conduct for more details.

Title

Give your question or discussion topic a great title, make it catchy and succinct.

Details

Make sure what you're about to say is specific and relevant - you'll get better responses.

Topics

Tag your discussion so you get more relevant responses.

Question goes here

1,300 Followers

  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
  • Name
    Details
Know someone who should answer this question? Enter their email below
Stay current and follow these discussion topics?